March 8, 2008...3:18 pm
Boeing to John McCain: thanks for costing US jobs !!
What Boeing loses is France’s gain,
for that, we all thank John Sydney McCain!
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - Angry Boeing supporters are vowing revenge against Republican presidential candidate John McCain over Chicago-based Boeing’s loss of a $35 billion Air Force tanker contract to the parent company of European plane maker Airbus.
There are other targets for their ire—the Air Force, the defense secretary and even the entire Bush administration.
But Boeing supporters in Congress are directing their wrath at McCain, the Arizona senator and nominee in waiting, for scuttling an earlier deal that would have let Boeing build the next generation of Air Force refueling tankers. Boeing now will miss out on a deal that it says would have supported 44,000 new and existing jobs at the company and suppliers in 40 states.
“I hope the voters of this state remember what John McCain has done to them and their jobs,” said Rep. Norm Dicks, D-Wash., whose state would have been home to the tanker program and gained about 9,000 jobs.
“Having made sure that Iraq gets new schools, roads, bridges and dams that we deny America, now we are making sure that France gets the jobs that Americans used to have,” said Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill. “We are sending the jobs overseas, all because John McCain demanded it.”
The European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. and its U.S. partner, Los Angeles-based Northrop Grumman, won a competition with Boeing Feb. 29 to build the refueling planes in one of the biggest Pentagon contracts in decades. The unexpected decision has sparked outrage from union halls to the halls of Congress over the impact on U.S. jobs, prestige and national security. EADS and Northrop say about 60 percent of their tanker will be built in the U.S.
McCain said he is keeping an open mind on the contract, but in the past he has boasted about his role in blocking an earlier version of the tanker deal that gave the contract to Boeing. The deal was killed in 2004 after a former Boeing executive improperly recruited cost the taxpayers more than $6 billion and ended up with people in federal prison,” he said. “I’m the one that fought against that … for years and brought down a corrupt contract.”
Keith Ashdown, with the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense, said Boeing executives who broke the law were to blame for the demise of the tanker contract—not McCain.
“This was theirs from day one,” he said. “This idea that any lawmaker is to blame is a joke.”
Still, Todd Donovan, a political science professor at Western Washington University, said McCain’s opposition to Boeing could hurt him with voters in Washington and other states affected by the tanker program. Boeing would have performed much of the work in Everett, Wash., and Wichita, Kan., and used Pratt & Whitney engines built in Connecticut. Significant work also was slated for Texas.
“If he can be painted as somehow being associated with job losses … it could hurt him on the margins,” Donovan said.
McCain’s role in the tanker deal did not bother Alabama politicians, including Republican Gov. Bob Riley, who endorsed McCain three days after the Air Force contract was announced.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8V956G00&show_article=1
3 Comments
March 11, 2008 at 7:08 pm
You fail to mention that Mobile, Alabama, will have a significant gain in jobs due to the manufacture of the tanker by Northrop-Grumman.
“The Northrup-Grumman KC-45A will include approximately 60 percent U.S. content. It IS America’s tanker.” (From http://www.northropgrumman.com/).
I, for one, am glad to see these jobs come to the Gulf Coast!
March 11, 2008 at 9:22 pm
I did a post about this and caught so much grief I took it down. Everyone says NG is an American company. Although, according to it’s corporate structure it is mostly EU
http://proceedings.ndia.org/3990/bauerlein_US_Defense_Industry.pdf
Could that be why there is a EU policy on the bottom of their site?
May 20, 2008 at 8:16 am
Boeing is not likely to lose many jobs due to the number of other contracts they have with the airline industry and government already. On the other hand, the jobs created in Mobile, AL with NG will result in a net American job gain.
Sorry, but if Boeing wanted this job, they should have offered a better product than NG-Airbus did. Their plane was better and more capable in almost every measurable way for not a drastic difference in price. They met or exceeded everything the USAF wanted from this plane and Boeing just mailed it in resting on their laurels.
Leave a Reply